The Pakistani media was quick to dismiss Indian allegations about the complicity of elements from Pakistan. Some channels even carried stories that there was no Aslam Amir in Faridkot. However, subsequent developments have shown that the media needs to reflect upon the whole paradigm of its coverage. Why does it take the UN declarations to prompt actions from Pakistan? Why do we have to wait for external pressure to mount to act against militant groups?
This lends credence to the view that militancy in Pakistan is , in part at least, a policy tool of the security establishment. Given so many other reports from even the British and the US media (e.g. The Telegraph and ABC News), Pakistan-based militants continue to be tools of also the western intelligence agencies such as the CIA and MI6. And at points, they are all alleged to be joined at the hip.
External factors are very much there but we also have an inner cancer. The only way to get out of this would be a policy of gradual disengagement from playing the great game and support of militancy, over the course of next several years. But in the absence of a clear policy and unwillingness to reduce dependence on the United States, the risk of Pakistan sinking deeper into the quagmire will only increase at a great cost to the national security interests.
More than President Zardari or the media, it is Pakistan’s military leadership that needs to do some honest soul searching and serious reflection on its long term policy options in the light of the current crisis and past failures.
The following stories from the Associated Press should be read in that context. Read more »